Losing Houses Left and Right

November 16, 2008

The past six months have been devastating for many homeowners across the United States as foreclosures are on the rise, and mortgages are becoming harder to pay off. This mortgage and credit crisis has been in the spotlight for many months, and is at the top of President Elect Barack Obama’s to-do list for January 21, 2009.

Unfortunately, a new threat is facing a slew of homeowners in California this week. A number of wildfires have broken out across Southern California, and have destroyed hundreds of homes. The greatest fear is clearly that the current death toll of 0 will not hold, and that lives will be lost to these ferocious blazes.The most destructive moment of the fires so far was when the Oakridge Mobile Home Park was nearly completely wiped out.

Thinking back to the destruction of Hurricanes Rita and Katrina in the last couple of years, it’s hard to fathom what it’s like when you realize your home and your worldly possessions are suddenly lost.

So what are we supposed to do? How do we help those who are losing their homes to fires in California? Are the multi-million dollar homes of Christopher Lloyd, Ophah Winfrey and Rob Lowe more important to save than the mobile homes in Oakridge?

Is it a worse feeling for a fire to destroy your home, or to have the bank repossess it?

These are not simple questions, and they do not have simple answers. Hopefully none of us will ever experience the loss of a home. Take a moment to think about what that might be like – how hard it would be to lose everything in an instant.

Tap into those emotions and feelings when you hear these news stories, and make sure not to just flip the channel without realizing the seriousness of the situation. I’m not sure what exactly we can do to help people in this situation, but at least we can take the moment to care.


Is torture (sometimes) okay?

August 11, 2008

For the last couple of years, a debate has been brewing about the military’s treatment of terror suspects. There has been evidence of prisoner abuse, complaints of innocent people being held without trial, and questions of whether water-boarding is considered torture.

The root question of this debate is how we balance the rights of individuals versus the protection of the American public from potential harm. Do we have the right to treat someone in an inhumane way in order to prevent a terrorist attack?

The question becomes – how big of an attack must be prevented in order to justify the torture of someone? Do you treat a major attack similar to 9/11 the same way you would an attack that might kill 2 people?

When, if ever, is torture justified? What do you think?


Get Involved in the Democratic Process

July 23, 2008

A few months ago, I wrote a post about how those who are under 18 can get involved in the the political discourse that is going on right now in this country. Today it is easier than ever to affect the outcome of November’s election without even stepping into a voting box.

It’s already old news that spreading the word through facebook, myspace, twitter and a dozen other social networking sites can help the effort. Posting about news and policy statements made by the candidates can really get people excited about a candidate.

But if you are a supporter of either of the major party candidates, there is a whole new level of involvement out there.

John McCain has launched McCainSpace which is an online forum that allows you to create your own MySpace-like page, recruit friends and family to the cause, and track upcoming events featuring Senator McCain. There is also a feature on the site that identifies key blogs (both liberal and conservative) that the McCain campaign wants supports to post comments to. (So far the EimaTimes hasn’t made the cut)

Barack Obama has a feature on his site very similar to facebook. My.barackobama.com is a place for supporters to connect with other Obama supporters, find local events they can become involved in, and setup fundraising challenges for friends and family.

The Obama campaign went one step further, however, with regards to letting any American help the campaign. Supporters are asked and encouraged to volunteer for the Obama campaign phone bank by making calls to people across the country from their home phone. A script is provided, along with contact information for a fellow citizen. (Cynthia McKinney, the Green Party Presidential nominee, has a similar option on her site)

The bottom line is that there are many ways to get involved in the political process. The key thing is always going to come down to education and awareness. To learn more about the nominees, check out some of these sites:

Project Vote Smart – Research voting records of political candidates, and see which candidates are supported by which lobby groups.

YouTube Face the Candidates – To see where the candidates stand on various issues, check out their pages on YouTube which feature videos of John McCain and Barack Obama speaking about the issues they care about. Hear it in their own words!

Indecision 2008 – If you take your politics a little less seriously, check out this site which is Comedy Central’s coverage of the election mostly featuring John Stewart and Stephen Colbert.


What is happening in Tibet?

March 31, 2008

It seems like every day a new report is out about Tibetans protesting the 2008 Summer Olympics, and the Chinese government that is hosting the games. Where did this whole thing come from? It seems like it started all of a sudden one day, and now it’s everywhere. What is it all about?

This will require a quick history lesson: In 1971, The Qing Dynasty that ruled China established the Dalai Lama and his regents as the spiritual and political leaders of Tibet. They continued in their rule through 1951. In 1911, Tibet proclaimed its independence from China, and although no other country recognized Tibet, it continued as a de-facto independent state until 1950.

In 1950, the Chinese army invaded Tibet, and easily overran the small Tibetan army.  Since then the Tibetan government led by the Dalai Lama has been in exile, and the Chinese government has been in control of the region. Chinese citizens were moved in to populate the area, and many Tibetans feel that their culture is being threatened.

March 2008 saw a flare-up in anti-China protests by Buddhist Monks living in Tibet, and has spread in advance of the China-hosted Olympics.

Whether or not China should relinquish some or all of its control of Tibet is one question, but the real issue is the way China has responded to the Tibetan protesters. Hundreds of peaceful protesters have been arrested, and journalists and diplomats have been barred from the region.

The US and the EU are pressuring China to change its ways, but this only highlights the question the world must be asking itself about choosing China to host the Summer Olympics. Will China clean up its human rights record? Will China stop persecuting members of the Falun Gong groups? Will China put pressure on the Sudanese government to stop the massacres in Darfur? Will China stop its ruthless crackdown of Tibetan dissent?

This is what the Tibet protests are all about. This is what we can all be thinking as we head towards the Summer Olympics that are only 129 days away.


Race in the 2008 Presidential… Race

March 26, 2008

As the 2008 Presidential Campaign inches forward, the focus has been squarely on the two remaining candidates for the Democratic nomination: Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama. In the midst of this, a question of race has been raised. Are Americans ready for a non-white president? Will Americans elect a non-white president?

Obviously it is not good to vote against someone because he’s black, but It’s just as bad to vote for him because he’s black. People should vote based on how they think that person would perform in office. But if we were to assume all things were equal aside from race, is that still a factor in the mind of Americans?Clearly Barrack Obama hopes it is not. Last week for the first time, Senator Obama addressed the issue of race head-on in a speech he gave in Philadelphia. He explained that an America that is distracted by issues of race would never be able to tackle healthcare, the economy, or the war in Iraq. He explained that it is time “to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native-American children…” Obama is trying to remove race as a factor in the election.

In 2000, the Jewish community was amazed that Senator Joseph Lieberman seemed to overcome his minority status when he was pegged by Al Gore to serve as his Vice Presidential running mate. Lieberman was the first Jew ever to run on a major American party presidential ticket. There was a time when it would be unfathomable for a Jew to achieve such a position in the government, and in 2000 the issue was barely a blip on the screen.

But we know that racism in this country has a long and ugly history that may not quietly disappear overnight.

In 1968, the same day the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King was shot and killed, Senator Robert F. Kennedy had the following to say:

“In this difficult time for the United States, it is perhaps well to ask what kind of a nation we are, and what direction we want to move in. For those of you who are black… you can be filled with bitterness, with hatred and a desire for revenge. We can move in that direction as a country, in great polarization – black people amongst black, white people amongst white, filled with hatred toward one another.

“Or we can make an effort, as Martin Luther King did, to understand and to comprehend, and to replace that violence, that stain of bloodshed that has spread across our land, with an effort to understand with compassion and love.”

We have come a long way since 1968, and race is far less divisive in this country than it once was. The question we have to ask ourselves is not whether Barrack Obama should be nominated by the Democratic Party or elected by the American people. The question right now is not about Obama’s policies, beliefs, or anything about him at all. The success of his campaign so far simply gives us the opportunity as a nation to do a little introspection and soul-searching. Therefore the questions is:

Do you think America is ready to not care about the race/ethnicity of the President? Post your opinion or comments here.


Rethinking the Death Penalty

November 20, 2007

New research has rehashed the moral debate on the Death Penalty. Does the government have the right to kill citizens, and if so, what good is it anyways?

As reported by the NY Times, a number of recent studies have show that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on future murders. It was determined that anywhere between 3-18 murders are prevented by each execution.

There has been some debate as to the validity of these studies as the number of executions is so low, and the amount of other factors that play into the murder rate is so high.

This, combined with a number of instances of overturned death sentences due to innovations in DNA analysis, has brought to light the moral question that is coupled with the deterrent factor.

Who has the right to take away life?

What is the Jewish take on the death penalty? Here’s what the OU had to say.

Does the fact that the Torah repeatedly ascribes death as the penalty for violations of Jewish law change our opinion in this matter?

Is it significant that historically, Jewish courts have been very cautious to actually impose that death penalty?

What do you think?